David Collier - Political Science, UC Berkeley

Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools Shared Standards (2004) by Henry E. Brady and David Collier.

To order, click here

From the Back Cover: "Rethinking Social Inquiry is a breakthrough book. It powerfully makes the case for social inquiry as a rigorous quest for valid causal inference that must exploit to the full the insights and strengths of both statistical and case-based methods. Brady and Collier and their fellow contributors show the pitfalls of mechanically applying dogmas from 'quantitative' or 'qualitative' extremes. Shared standards are possible; and researchers using diverse research designs can work together to build illuminating, empirically grounded theories. All political scientists --indeed all social scientists -- should read and reflect on this compelling set of arguments." Theda Skocpol, Harvard University

"King, Keohane, and Verba's Designing Social Inquiry aimed at incorporating qualitative research methods into the conceptual framework of quantitative methodology. But was the attempt successful? What is the relationship between qualitative and quantitative methods? In this volume, Brady, Collier, and several other prominent social scientists, address these questions in powerful essays. Everyone interested in research methods, and certainly everyone teaching the subject, will want to read this book." Christopher H. Achen, Princeton University

"I love this book and its pragmatic, ecumenical message. In an era where deep, if artificial, methodological divisions unnecessarily hamstring social research, this book is especially timely. Written by some of the most skilled and innovative methodologists in political science, the individual essays are consistently excellent. But it is the larger message about the need for methodological breadth and variety that will make the book such a valuable teaching tool." Douglas McAdam, Director, Center for Advanced Study in the Behaviorial Sciences, Stanford University

"The authors display a sophisticated understanding of the diverse strengths and pitfalls of quantitative and qualitative methods of inference within the context of a common commitment to the idea that political science is a scientific enterprise. The essays in this collection ought to be on the reading list of the introductory methods course that all graduate programs offer." Michael Wallerstein, Yale University